Featured Solutions

Portfolio Diversification: Tweaking the Recipe and Expanding the Menu

Diversifying portfolios amid ultra-low rates requires that investors get more from traditional diversifiers such as cash and duration and consider alternative strategies such as managed futures and alternative risk premia.

Nobel laureate Harry Markowitz famously said that diversification is the only true free lunch in investing. Yet it’s not always free – in fact, it may be getting more expensive.

With yields near multi-decade lows on cash, U.S. Treasuries, developed market sovereign bonds and other traditional diversifiers, a number of investors have concluded that compensation for holding these assets simply isn’t adequate. Some also worry that these assets have limited ability to mitigate portfolio downside: Yields are so low, there’s little room to fall further (see Figure 1).

In recent years some have pared their allocations, while others have meaningfully reduced portfolio duration – only to see performance suffer as yields fell. Now, many are left wondering when to get back in.


The high opportunity cost of traditional diversifiers

Source: PIMCO and Bloomberg as of 30 September 2015
Hypothetical example for illustrative purposes only. Cash is represented by the three-month USD Libor Index; U.S. core bonds is represented by the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index; global sovereign bonds is represented by the JP Morgan GBI Global ex-US USD Hedged Index; and long-term Treasuries is represented by the Barclays Long-Term Treasury Index. Current yields represent the yield to maturity for each index as of 30 September 2015. PIMCO's 10-year annualized returns forecast is an estimate of what investments may earn on average over a 10-year period. Return assumptions are not a prediction or a projection of return. Actual returns may be higher or lower than those shown and may vary substantially over shorter time periods. Figures are provided for illustrative purposes and are not indicative of the past or future performance of any PIMCO product.

The recent spike in market volatility underscores the urgency of this issue. While there is no silver bullet, we suggest a two-pronged approach to enhance the diversification and risk-mitigation potential of policy portfolios:

  1. Get the most “bang for the buck” from traditional diversifiers.
  2. Consider non-traditional diversifiers with higher expected returns and/or the ability to provide significantly more downside mitigation.

As with most things in investing, long-horizon investors have a clear edge in making these decisions.

Getting the most out of traditional diversifiers

Consider a move from cash to enhanced cash
Cash is a multi-faceted asset which serves three key roles in multi-asset portfolios: liquidity provision, offensive dry powder, and arguably with reduced efficacy, an anchor to windward. All these benefits, however, come with a trade-off: low yield.

To address this, investors can look beyond money market instruments to short-term bond strategies that aim to provide higher yields by investing in assets with slightly longer duration or slightly higher credit risk (see Figure 2). The ongoing reforms in the money markets are creating several opportunities to add further value through active management (see Jerome M. Schneider’s recent article, “The B-Side of Capital Preservation”).


Yields of money market instruments vs other cash equivalents

Source: Bloomberg, ICAP and BofA Merrill Lynch as of 30 September 2015 *397 days refers to the SEC rule stipulating that a security must have less than 397 days until maturity to be eligible for classification as a “money market security.” Agencies: Agency discount note (composite of discount-offered levels received from brokers and dealers for U.S. Agency discount notes); Treasuries (U.S. on-the-run government bill/ note/ and bond indexes); commercial paper, certificate of deposit and corporate are composite curves provided by Bloomberg; general repo (consolidated data provided by ICAP); Agency repo: consolidated data provided by ICAP; AA, A and BBB corporate curves represented by their respective generic Bloomberg USD US Corporate Curves.

Maintain portfolio duration (or be cautious when reducing)
A key question facing investors in a low-yield environment is whether lowering portfolio duration is a wise long-term investment strategy. We believe the answer is no for investors with long-term liabilities and those with meaningful exposure to risky and illiquid assets. Over time, bond investors are compensated for being long duration – as long as yield curves are upward-sloping, which has nearly always been the case (barring the very late stages of economic expansions). As such, a structurally lower duration position is not advisable for the multi-asset investor with a moderate to long horizon, for the most part regardless of the path of interest rates. Even for investors who lack long-term liabilities or are underweight risk assets, the decision to reduce duration should be made with great care and caution. A reduction in duration is likely to lead to diminished diversification at the policy-portfolio level, something investors could consider offsetting by broadening the menu as we discuss below.


if 30-year treasury yields replicated their trend in reverse

Source: PIMCO and Bloomberg. Data from September 2000 – September 2015


Simulated returns of 10-year and 30-year U.S. Treasuries from the mirroring exercise

Source: Bloomberg and PIMCO. Data from September 2000 – September 2015
Hypothetical example for illustrative purposes only. PIMCO simulation based on Bloomberg generic U.S. Treasury yield data from September 2000 – September 2015. Simulation assumes a 10-year or 30-year Treasury is held for one month, then sold and the proceeds reinvested in another 10-year or 30-year Treasury security (respectively). Figures are provided for illustrative purposes and are not indicative of the past or future performance of any PIMCO product.

As discussed in “The Case for Duration in the Long Run,” even if interest rates were to mirror the path they have taken over the past 15 years – i.e., they shoot higher over the next 15 years – strategies with longer duration can still post positive returns. This is due to the magic of compounding yields: As rates grind higher over time, elevated carry may overcome principal losses, providing the potential for net positive returns (see Figures 3 and 4).

So how much duration is appropriate given the prospect for rising rates? The answer, of course, depends on an investor’s objectives, risk tolerance, horizon and existing exposure to risk assets, among other factors. This is a topic of frequent discussion between PIMCO’s solutions group and our clients.

Also, when the Fed eventually decides to hike interest rates, front-end yields are most likely going to rise, but the impact further out the yield curve is a bit more ambiguous if history is any guide. Nevertheless, the liftoff will present active managers with attractive opportunities to add value through duration and yield curve strategies.

Broaden the menu of diversifying strategies
Another way to address the diversification challenge is to broaden the menu. Academic research and modern financial tools have spurred a new class of strategies designed to capture alternative sources of returns with low correlations to traditional assets. Some are beginning to go mainstream.

Time-series momentum (managed futures)
Among the most promising is time-series momentum. This captures the phenomenon whereby an asset’s return history tends to indicate its future performance: Recent winners are expected to continue to win and recent losers should continue to lose – they exhibit momentum.

Time-series momentum is a simple trend-following strategy that goes long in markets that have experienced positive excess return over a defined look-back horizon, and vice versa. It is among the most well-documented and extensively researched market anomalies, shown to work across most major asset classes and countries. Studies show it has the potential to generally deliver long-run returns with negative correlation to risk assets in down markets and positive correlation in up markets. In other words, time-series momentum strategies have the potential to help investors reduce downside capture and add upside capture (see Figure 5).


Managed futures have outperformed in stressed markets chart

Managed futures have outperformed in stressed markets table

Source: PIMCO and Bloomberg
Hypothetical example for illustrative purposes only.
The Time-Series Momentum Model trades 20 markets: five each in equity index, bond, currency and commodity futures. The strategy trades once per week, taking a long position if the current futures price is above the one-year moving average price, and taking a short position if it is below. Each position is scaled inversely to the recent three-month daily realized volatility of the contract, and the overall strategy is scaled to target 10% volatility using trailing 10-year windows to estimate volatility of the strategy. Over short periods, risk can be skewed to some asset classes. Fixed transaction costs ranging between 1 basis point and 10 basis points were estimated from available market data for each futures market and subtracted from returns. No fees have been applied to model data; performance would be lower if applied. Figures are provided for illustrative purposes and are not indicative of the past or future performance of any PIMCO product.

Even though time-series momentum has gained mainstream acceptance, no one really knows why it works. Popular explanations include initial underreaction and delayed overreaction by investors due to behavioral biases such as anchoring, confirmation, disposition effect and herding – factors unlikely to disappear anytime soon.

In the past, investors could access time-series momentum only through commodity trading advisors (CTA) hedge funds. These were generally opaque and typically charged high fees. Now, these strategies can be accessed at much lower cost via mutual funds that provide daily liquidity at NAV. Regardless of vehicle, manager selection is critical, as there is no single “right” implementation strategy to capture the momentum factor. There is large divergence in risks and returns across managers in this category.

Alternative risk premia
Another approach with the potential to deliver high returns with low to negative correlation to traditional asset classes harnesses alternative risk premia (also known as style premia or structural alpha). This approach involves allocating to a basket of systematic strategies that seek to harvest well-known and persistent sources of excess return potential within and across asset classes (see our In Depth article “Carry and Trend in Lots of Places”). Studies show that a large portion of hedge fund returns can be attributed to systematic exposures to various style premia (see Figure 6).


The alternative risk premia model has performed historically

The alternative risk premia model has performed historically

Source: PIMCO and Bloomberg
Hypothetical example for illustrative purposes only. The 60/40 portfolio is based on the S&P 500 and the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index. The Alternative Risk Premia Model is a rules-based, defined opportunity set diversified portfolio of six systematic strategies that seek to capture time-series momentum, value, carry, and volatility risk premia across global equity, interest rates, G-20 currency, and commodity markets. The risk contribution from each systematic strategy is sized to maintain balance across asset classes and styles. The model targets an ex-ante volatility of 10%. For this article we assumed a static weighting for the historical period. The 60/40 + 10% Alternative Risk Premia Model comprises 54% S&P 500 Index, 36% Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index and 10% Alternative Risk Premia Model. The 60/40 + 20% Alternative Risk Premia Model comprises 48% S&P 500 Index, 32% Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index and 20% Alternative Risk Premia Model. The 60/40 + 30% Alternative Risk Premia Model comprises 42% S&P 500 Index, 28% Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index and 30% Alternative Risk Premia Model. No fees have been applied to model data; performance would be lower if applied. Figures are provided for illustrative purposes and are not indicative of the past or future performance of any PIMCO product.

Alternative indexation strategies, also known as “smart beta,” are closely related to alternative risk premia; they take exposure to some of the same factors. Yet there is an important distinction. Smart beta strategies are long-only and therefore have a high degree of market exposure. Alternative risk premia strategies, in contrast, are primarily long/short and therefore have little to no market exposure.

While alternative risk premia can be (partially) accessed by investing in smart beta indexes, a market-neutral, multi-asset approach can be compelling because it can isolate the diversification prowess of these strategies by largely stripping out market beta. Also, combining various alternative risk premia across assets has its own diversification benefits because some of these premia – value and momentum, for instance – are negatively correlated with each other.

Historically, as Figure 6 shows, adding these strategies to a conventional 60/40 portfolio not only improved the risk/reward characteristics, but also provided meaningful diversification benefits. The Alternative Risk Premia Model exhibited close to zero beta to the equity market over the full sample, and negative equity beta during large drawdowns, thus providing diversification when it mattered the most.

The devil is in the details, however, when it comes to investing in alternative risk premia. Questions that frequently arise include which premia to take exposure to, why they continue to persist, whether they can be traded, how much risk to allocate to each, whether allocations should be static or dynamic, and the total market capacity for such strategies. As portfolio risk exposures may vary, customization may make sense for large institutional investors. In any event, it’s critical to select managers with sound answers to these questions and trading and risk management systems to construct these strategies and efficiently and appropriately trade them.

Tail risk hedging
Tail risk hedging is the third arrow in the quest to achieve diversification and downside mitigation with limited opportunity cost. Tail risk hedging is an option-based strategy that seeks to shield portfolios during sudden market shocks by investing in put options or option-like securities. In our view, it is best performed at the policy-portfolio level in a holistic fashion. PIMCO has extensively researched and written about our approach to tail risk hedging, including the book, “Tail Risk Hedging: Creating Robust Portfolios for Volatile Markets.”

The key difference between the strategies outlined above and tail risk hedging is the latter’s ability to address “gap risk.” Tail risk hedging is designed to reduce portfolio drawdowns during black swan events such as Black Monday, 9/11 and the 2010 Flash Crash. Furthermore, the return pattern of tail risk hedging is highly convex, i.e., potential returns increase exponentially with the size of the market sell-off.

While several institutional investors have adopted portfolio-level tail risk hedging and view it as another asset class, others have hesitated to do so as they can’t stomach having to regularly write checks to invest in hedges. An alternate approach is to aim to make the tail risk hedging allocations self-funded by investing in an income-producing strategy that seeks to generate enough yield on a consistent basis to offset the periodic costs of acquiring the hedges.

There are two trade-offs in adopting this approach: higher capital commitment and somewhat less loss mitigation during tail events (as the income-producing strategy in that scenario will likely suffer losses, offsetting some of the gains generated by the tail risk hedging component of the portfolio).

Optimizing diversification
In sum, Markowitz’ free lunch still exists but the pickings on the traditional buffet have gotten slimmer. The solution to rock-bottom yields on core diversifying assets is to expand the menu. Find the right mix of enhancing traditional diversifiers and add non-traditional diversifiers with the potential to enhance returns and allay the downside.

There are still viable options for long-term, risk-conscious investors willing to fight inertia and expand their horizons.

The authors would like to thank Portfolio Managers Josh Davis, Graham Rennison and Matt Dorsten for their contributions to this article.

The Author

Ashish Tiwari

Asset Allocation Strategist

James Moore

Co-Head of Client Solutions and Analytics


Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. All investments contain risk and may lose value. Alternative investment strategies are often subject to greater risk than traditional investments. Tail risk hedging may involve entering into financial derivatives that are expected to increase in value during the occurrence of tail events. Investing in a tail event instrument could lose all or a portion of its value even in a period of severe market stress. A tail event is unpredictable; therefore, investments in instruments tied to the occurrence of a tail event are speculative. Derivatives may involve certain costs and risks such as liquidity, interest rate, market, credit, management and the risk that a position could not be closed when most advantageous. Investing in derivatives could lose more than the amount invested. Diversification does not ensure against loss. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long-term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision.

This material contains hypothetical modeling and is intended illustrative purposes only. No representation is being made that any account, product, or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits, losses, or results similar to those shown. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have several inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual performance and are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. There are frequently sharp differences between simulated performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular account, product or strategy. In addition, since trades have not actually been executed, simulated results cannot account for the impact of certain market risks such as lack of liquidity. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or the implementation of any specific investment strategy, which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of simulated results and all of which can adversely affect actual results.

It is not possible to invest directly in an unmanaged index.

This material contains the opinions of the author but not necessarily those of PIMCO and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

PIMCO provides services only to qualified institutions and investors. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. | Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. | PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517), PIMCO Europe, Ltd Amsterdam Branch (Company No. 24319743), and PIMCO Europe Ltd - Italy (Company No. 07533910969) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS) in the U.K. The Amsterdam and Italy branches are additionally regulated by the AFM and CONSOB in accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act, respectively. PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products are available only to professional clients as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook and are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Deutschland GmbH (Company No. 192083, Seidlstr. 24-24a, 80335 Munich, Germany) is authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (Marie-Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main) in Germany in accordance with Section 32 of the German Banking Act (KWG). The services and products provided by PIMCO Deutschland GmbH are available only to professional clients as defined in Section 31a para. 2 German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). They are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO (Schweiz) GmbH (registered in Switzerland, Company No. CH-, Brandschenkestrasse 41, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland, Tel: + 41 44 512 49 10. The services and products provided by PIMCO Switzerland GmbH are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication but contact their financial adviser. | PIMCO Asia Pte Ltd (501 Orchard Road #09-03, Wheelock Place, Singapore 238880, Registration No. 199804652K) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a capital markets services licence and an exempt financial adviser. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Asia Limited (Suite 2201, 22nd Floor, Two International Finance Centre, No. 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong) is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission for Types 1, 4 and 9 regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 084 280 508, AFSL 246862 (PIMCO Australia) offers products and services to both wholesale and retail clients as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (limited to general financial product advice in the case of retail clients). This communication is provided for general information only without taking into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investors. | PIMCO Japan Ltd (Toranomon Towers Office 18F, 4-1-28, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-0001) Financial Instruments Business Registration Number is Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 382. PIMCO Japan Ltd is a member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and The Investment Trusts Association, Japan. Investment management products and services offered by PIMCO Japan Ltd are offered only to persons within its respective jurisdiction, and are not available to persons where provision of such products or services is unauthorized. Valuations of assets will fluctuate based upon prices of securities and values of derivative transactions in the portfolio, market conditions, interest rates and credit risk, among others. Investments in foreign currency denominated assets will be affected by foreign exchange rates. There is no guarantee that the principal amount of the investment will be preserved, or that a certain return will be realized; the investment could suffer a loss. All profits and losses incur to the investor. The amounts, maximum amounts and calculation methodologies of each type of fee and expense and their total amounts will vary depending on the investment strategy, the status of investment performance, period of management and outstanding balance of assets and thus such fees and expenses cannot be set forth herein.| PIMCO Canada Corp. (199 Bay Street, Suite 2050, Commerce Court Station, P.O. Box 363, Toronto, ON, M5L 1G2) services and products may only be available in certain provinces or territories of Canada and only through dealers authorized for that purpose. | PIMCO Latin America Edifício Internacional Rio Praia do Flamengo, 154 1o andar, Rio de Janeiro – RJ Brasil 22210-906. | No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO and YOUR GLOBAL INVESTMENT AUTHORITY are trademarks or registered trademarks of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, respectively, in the United States and throughout the world. ©2015, PIMCO.