Joe Deane, head of municipal bond portfolio management at PIMCO, portfolio manager Julie Callahan, and Sean McCarthy, head of the municipal credit research team, discuss munis’ strong showing in 2014, our outlook for credit and what we expect in the year ahead.

Q: What factors contributed to the great year municipal bonds had?
Joe Deane: Municipal bonds surprised many by ending the year as one of the best-performing asset classes – buoyed by investors’ search for yield in a low interest-rate environment. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index was up 9.05% for the year and this strong performance was attributable to a combination of factors.

Demand turned positive in the first quarter of the year from returning retail investors, who had pulled out of the market in 2013, and continued to improve throughout 2014. Municipal mutual funds received $21.4 billion in net inflows for the year – compared with outflows of $62.7 billion in 2013. Crossover investors such as banks and insurance companies also took advantage of attractive relative valuations, particularly early in the year. This returning demand was coupled with low market supply as municipalities remain reluctant to take on additional debt – even at today’s very low rates. Total supply of $335 billion for the year ended in line with 2013 levels, but aggregate new money issuance declined year over year and remains well below pre-recession levels.

Improving perceptions of credit risk in the municipal market have also been additive. The market was rattled midyear by a spate of downgrades in Puerto Rico, but since then, the commonwealth has bought itself some time with new debt issuance, and negative credit headlines have largely receded for the time being. It’s important to note that many state and local governments are still grappling with substantial unfunded pension liabilities, but it will likely take some time before the effects of this come to light. In the meantime, the market has seen some positives, including California’s rating upgrade, following voters’ passage of Proposition 2, which establishes a rainy day fund for the state, and improving tax revenues across a number of states, stemming from the strengthening U.S. economy.

Q: Sean, would you elaborate on Puerto Rico and discuss PIMCO’s outlook for credit more broadly?
Sean McCarthy: The Puerto Rico credit story continues to evolve, with the economy moving sideways as the government strives to address its fiscal and debt crisis. The market anticipates a $2.9 billion petroleum tax deal late first quarter which will support efforts to ring-fence the island’s central government from a key public agency. This is the second time in 12 months that Puerto Rico has urgently needed to print a new transaction to bolster the central government’s liquidity position.

The successful placement of the petroleum tax-backed deal may allow Puerto Rico’s current administration another fiscal year to address remaining budgetary challenges and implement comprehensive tax reform. However, the island has additional near-term refunding needs that must still be addressed, and a restructuring of the publicly-owned electric utility is likely in the next several months. We also believe there are increased risks related to the execution of policy and reform ahead of the island’s elections in 2016.

Looking beyond Puerto Rico, credit quality across state and local municipalities is expected to continue to improve in 2015. States are still exhibiting fiscal restraint, but are expected to modestly expand general fund expenditures in the 2015 and 2016 fiscal years. Conditions have improved due to increased economic activity and several years of revenue, aided in some instances by temporary tax measures taken to close structural budget deficits. However, recovery from the recession has been slower than typical and several states must contend with mandatory spending requirements and rising costs related to an aging population. There are also several states that have still not taken decisive steps to combat their large and growing unfunded pension and other post-retirement debt burdens. And many of these same actors are experiencing a tepid economic recovery. We expect retirement obligations will continue to be a major credit theme and will have an adverse effect on the credit quality of several key states in 2015 and beyond. In addition, recent changes imposed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) are likely to reveal that pension burdens are greater than previously reported.

Local government credit quality is also improving, but the recovery is slower than in the states, due in part to a lag in the frequency of assessments affecting property tax collections and an uneven recovery in housing across regions of the U.S. Local government agencies must also contend with large unfunded retirement obligations and often have less revenue flexibility to adjust to higher cost structures versus the states. In many instances, local government agencies are also adjusting to reduced intergovernmental transfers from the state relative to pre-recession levels.

Finally, we would note that the sharp drop in crude oil from June 2014 highs is likely to have a bifurcated effect on state and local government credit quality. The drop in crude to current levels is the equivalent of a tax cut for consumers at the gas pump, which could contribute to increased sales tax receipts and benefit certain municipal asset classes, including toll roads. On the other hand, the drop in crude will result in some budgetary stress for the energy-producing states, but we believe that this pressure will be absorbed over the current and following fiscal year as the states make necessary midyear adjustments. In addition, the largest U.S. energy-producing states either have ample budgetary reserves or depend less on oil and gas revenues to fund their operating budgets, as severance taxes collected on the extraction of oil and gas are often used to fund capital projects or reserves. There may be some isolated pockets of stress for local municipalities and counties in regions with a high dependence on energy. These communities may be affected by layoffs and a reduction of capital spending by drilling companies, and lower property tax collections from parcels with wells that are shuttered.

Q: Julie, why is active management so important in this market environment, especially in the context of the ladder strategies that you manage?
Julie Callahan: As Joe and I have discussed previously, today’s municipal market is large, fragmented and localized, with over $3.6 trillion in outstanding debt among more than 78,000 municipal issuers.* The financial crisis essentially transformed this vast market from a Treasury-centric market – with widespread use of insurance – into a credit market. Now, municipal issues trade to the strength of their underlying creditworthiness, making active management and credit due diligence much more important today.

This is part of the reason we’ve seen such success with our municipal ladder strategies. Many financial advisors, who had assembled and managed their own municipal bond ladders in the past, are turning to active managers like PIMCO because they don’t have the resources to conduct the rigorous credit due diligence that’s needed on their own. We currently manage $3.5 billion in ladder strategies (as of December 31, 2014), and our credit team has independently analyzed and rated every security in our portfolios.

Importantly, at PIMCO, our investment process has never relied on insurance or external credit rating agencies. Instead, we employ rigorous and ongoing credit analysis at both the issuer and obligor levels and have our own internal rating system – our analysts develop their own ratings, including their outlook on how those ratings might develop over the year. This forward-looking approach helps to mitigate credit risk and volatility across all of our municipal bond portfolios and was the reason we began to de-risk the Puerto Rico positions in our tax-exempt dedicated national and state-specific portfolios in 2011 – long before the island’s debt saw significant price declines.

Also, as Joe and Sean both mentioned, there are state and local budgetary problems that will play out over a long time horizon. Because investors in ladder strategies allocate a portion of their portfolios to longer-maturity municipal bonds and primarily expect to buy and hold these positions, they need to be confident that their investment manager’s credit research is forward-looking, so they don’t have unpleasant portfolio surprises five years from now.

Additionally, with rates expected to rise in the latter half of 2015, we expect increased market volatility. Skilled active managers can quickly take advantage of dislocations in the muni market that can stem from Federal Reserve (the Fed) policies, Treasury rate moves or negative headlines.

Q: Joe, have there been any recent changes to the way the team manages munis?
Deane: Our day-to-day portfolio management has not changed at all. In fact, Julie and I as well as the rest of the team continue to manage our portfolios the same way we’ve been managing them throughout our careers – by investing in attractive, high quality municipal issues.

Importantly, the team continues to benefit from PIMCO’s robust investment process, which adds value from top to bottom. The firm’s macro outlook is developed at our quarterly economic forums and distilled into investment guidelines by our Investment Committee (IC). One change that’s been a positive for our business over the past year has been a closer reporting relationship up to PIMCO’s CIOs and IC. The IC typically meets four times a week and is critical in setting investment strategy and risk targets across the firm. Having a closer link to the IC and to the senior thought leaders at the firm has definitely been a positive for our team.

From the bottom-up, we emphasize proprietary research, security selection and ongoing surveillance provided by our dedicated team of municipal analysts who leverage the expertise of more than 60 firm-wide credit analysts. Each municipal bond we own is monitored on an ongoing basis. We never rely on agency ratings, as Julie mentioned earlier, and we’re always on the lookout for indications of a potential downgrade.

Q: What’s your outlook for 2015, Joe? Can we expect more of the same?
Deane: Given last year’s strong returns, we’re positioned cautiously for greater volatility in the fixed income markets. We’re maintaining an up-in-credit quality bias and favor liquid securities that would be more resilient in adverse market conditions. In keeping with our investment thesis, we prefer revenue-backed bonds over most GO debt, as these sectors typically benefit from dedicated revenue streams and don’t have the pension challenges that many state and local governments face. While we remain underweight to GO debt generally, we’re investing in select GOs in geographies that are tied to a continued recovery in U.S. housing and are less vulnerable to pension issues.

Because PIMCO expects that the Fed will likely begin raising rates in the second half of 2015, we are also maintaining an underweight duration positioning across most of our strategies to help protect investor returns in a period of rising interest rates due to the high correlation between municipal bond yields and Treasury rates.

It’s important to note that there is also pent-up supply in the system. Net supply has been negative for three years in a row, meaning that new issuance levels have been lower than the amount of debt that has matured or been called. In the midterm elections, voters approved $37 billion of $44 billion in ballot measures, the highest level since the downturn, which is a sign that state and local governments are beginning to think about new capital projects again. However, with state general fund spending below the 25-year historical average, weak wage growth, and uncertain funding for road projects from the Highway Trust Fund, we expect many states to remain cautious with respect to new money issuance. Whether this pent-up supply comes to market remains to be seen, and will be the result of state and local government confidence in the economy as well as the rate environment.

If supply does pick up, it could put pressure on the market, as supply and demand imbalances can have a major impact on muni market returns. Importantly, this can create some very attractive valuations for active managers, like PIMCO, with the credit resources and market presence to take advantage of these market inefficiencies.

The Author

Julie P. Callahan

Portfolio Manager, Municipal Bonds

Sean McCarthy

Head of Municipal Credit Research



Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. Income from municipal bonds may be subject to state and local taxes and at times the alternative minimum tax; a strategy concentrating in a single or limited number of states is subject to greater risk of adverse economic conditions and regulatory changes. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and the current low interest rate environment increases this risk. Current reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. The credit quality of a particular security or group of securities does not ensure the stability or safety of an overall portfolio.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. References to specific securities and their issuers are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase, sell or hold such securities. PIMCO products and strategies may or may not include the securities referenced and, if such securities are included, no representation is being made that such securities will continue to be included.

This material contains the opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of PIMCO and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

PIMCO provides services only to qualified institutions and investors. This is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. | Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, 650 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. | PIMCO Europe Ltd (Company No. 2604517), PIMCO Europe, Ltd Amsterdam Branch (Company No. 24319743), and PIMCO Europe Ltd - Italy (Company No. 07533910969) are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS) in the UK. The Amsterdam and Italy Branches are additionally regulated by the AFM and CONSOB in accordance with Article 27 of the Italian Consolidated Financial Act, respectively. PIMCO Europe Ltd services and products are available only to professional clients as defined in the Financial Conduct Authority’s Handbook and are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Deutschland GmbH (Company No. 192083, Seidlstr. 24-24a, 80335 Munich, Germany) is authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) (Marie- Curie-Str. 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt am Main) in Germany in accordance with Section 32 of the German Banking Act (KWG). The services and products provided by PIMCO Deutschland GmbH are available only to professional clients as defined in Section 31a para. 2 German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). They are not available to individual investors, who should not rely on this communication. | PIMCO Asia Pte Ltd (501 Orchard Road #09-03, Wheelock Place, Singapore 238880, Registration No. 199804652K) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a capital markets services licence and an exempt financial adviser. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Asia Limited (Suite 2201, 22nd Floor, Two International Finance Centre, No. 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong) is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission for Types 1, 4 and 9 regulated activities under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. The asset management services and investment products are not available to persons where provision of such services and products is unauthorised. | PIMCO Australia Pty Ltd (Level 19, 363 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia), AFSL 246862 and ABN 54084280508, offers services to wholesale clients as defined in the Corporations Act 2001. | PIMCO Japan Ltd (Toranomon Towers Office 18F, 4-1-28, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 105-0001) Financial Instruments Business Registration Number is Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No.382. PIMCO Japan Ltd is a member of Japan Investment Advisers Association and The Investment Trusts Association, Japan. Investment management products and services offered by PIMCO Japan Ltd are offered only to persons within its respective jurisdiction, and are not available to persons where provision of such products or services is unauthorized. Valuations of assets will fluctuate based upon prices of securities and values of derivative transactions in the portfolio, market conditions, interest rates, and credit risk, among others. Investments in foreign currency denominated assets will be affected by foreign exchange rates. There is no guarantee that the principal amount of the investment will be preserved, or that a certain return will be realized; the investment could suffer a loss. All profits and losses incur to the investor. The amounts, maximum amounts and calculation methodologies of each type of fee and expense and their total amounts will vary depending on the investment strategy, the status of investment performance, period of management and outstanding balance of assets and thus such fees and expenses cannot be set forth herein. | PIMCO Canada Corp. (199 Bay Street, Suite 2050, Commerce Court Station, P.O. Box 363, Toronto, ON, M5L 1G2) services and products may only be available in certain provinces or territories of Canada and only through dealers authorized for that purpose. | PIMCO Latin America Edifício Internacional Rio Praia do Flamengo, 154 1o andar, Rio de Janeiro – RJ Brasil 22210-906. | No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO and YOUR GLOBAL INVESTMENT AUTHORITY are trademarks or registered trademarks of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, respectively, in the United States and throughout the world. © 2015, PIMCO.