U.S. Inflation Outlook 2015: The Fed Versus the Market​​

​​Market pricing of U.S. Treasuries and TIPS appears inconsistent with the Fed’s views on inflation.​


Inflation data has taken on more importance recently than at any other time since the global financial crisis. And the narratives about U.S. inflation – or the lack of it – have been hotly debated.

On the reflation side of the argument, you have the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC). The FOMC has said that current low realized inflation is mostly due to an oil supply shock that is good for both the consumer and the U.S. economy. According to the Fed’s line of thinking, U.S. interest rates are low largely because of increased demand for nominal Treasuries, which has reduced their risk premia. While the “inflation compensation” that can be derived from Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) has moved lower, that could be the result of demand for nominal Treasuries alongside rising liquidity premia in less-liquid TIPS. Supporting this theory are survey-based measures of long-term inflation expectations, which are little changed despite current inflation running below the Fed’s 2% target. Finally, the Fed believes that the U.S. will have higher inflation over the medium-term horizon due to the ongoing strengthening of the labor market and closing of the output gap.

On the disinflation side of the argument, you have the markets. Investors in global fixed income markets seem to be interpreting lower oil prices as due, at least in part, to weaker oil demand and a weakening global economy. In their view, low U.S. nominal interest rates reflect that economic weakness, and low inflation expectations are a result of premature hawkishness from the FOMC, which stands ready to raise interest rates as early as mid-2015. Current market pricing of U.S. Treasuries assumes secular deflationary forces – like demographics, deleveraging and globalization – will keep inflation at bay for a long time.

So who is right, the markets or the Fed? The right answer will be key to investment returns in 2015.

A closer look at inflation dynamics
While headline inflation softened in 2014, core measures of U.S. inflation ended the year about where they started. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by 0.8% year-over-year versus 1.5% in 2013, reflecting lower energy prices. However, the core CPI, which excludes volatile components such as food and energy prices, increased by 1.6%, similar to its 1.7% increase in 2013. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index rose 0.7% versus 1.2% a year ago, and the core PCE – the index most closely followed by the Fed to drive monetary policy – remained steady at 1.3% from year-end 2013 to year-end 2014.

The main driver for headline inflation in 2015 will likely be the 50% drop in oil prices. With gasoline accounting for 4.5% of the CPI, we expect headline CPI to print negative on a year-over-year basis for most of the year. Market-based measures of inflation are also anticipating this: The TIPS market implies negative headline year-on-year inflation for most​ of 2015.

But while the drop in headline inflation is pretty much “baked in” and already accounted for by the markets, the key question is whether core inflation will decelerate as well. While the Federal Reserve may look through energy volatility to set the timing of their first hike, changes in core inflation (either weaker or stronger) will likely factor heavily into monetary policy decisions.

So what do we expect for core U.S. inflation over the cyclical horizon? Higher shelter costs were the main contributors in 2014, something we anticipated (see the Viewpoint, “U.S. Inflation Outlook 2014: Signs of Life”). We expect shelter costs to rise by 3% in 2015, driven by the lagged impact of higher home prices and a low vacancy rate. This will contribute to continued strength in services CPI, which increased at 2.5% in 2014, indicating a robust domestic economy. Meanwhile, consumer goods prices surprised us by declining in 2014 (we had expected a marginally positive contribution), though we expect reversion of some of that weakness. Taking all these factors into account, our bottom-up inflation model would point at 2% U.S. core CPI for 2015 (see Figure 1).


However, key top-down macro issues will also factor into our forecast for core CPI this year. These are the pass-through from weak energy prices into core prices, the impact of a stronger dollar and the effects of an incrementally tight U.S. labor market.

How will lower oil prices affect core inflation?
One way to quantify the potential pass-through of negative headline inflation into core inflation is a simple regression analysis of core CPI against the gap between headline and core CPI with a six-month lag. This regression shows a beta of 0.2 over the past 20 years, so if headline CPI runs at −0.5% against a core CPI trending at 2%, the model implies a 0.5% drag on core CPI, which would move our original core forecast from 2% down to 1.5%.

But we believe this naïve regression overstates the inflation pass-through because changes in energy prices have often been driven by general economic conditions over the last 20 years (for example, during the global financial crisis). This time around, however, we attribute the drop in energy prices to a welcome improvement in supply capacity. Accounting for this broader economic context by adding income, unemployment and other indicators to the regression analysis reduces the pass-through of lower energy prices to core CPI to 0.15%, which would reduce our original bottom-up forecast of 2015 core CPI to 1.85%. But we still need to consider how to incorporate other top-down factors.

What about a stronger dollar?
The deflationary shock of 2008 has been the hot potato that central bankers have been passing around through weaker currencies. One can easily link lower consumer goods prices with the stronger dollar – the tradable sector should be the most sensitive to changes in the currency, and dollar strength may explain some of the weakness in core goods inflation in 2014. But historically, the correlation between the dollar and inflation has been close to 0, probably because a stronger dollar typically came alongside a stronger economy. Lower goods inflation means more money in the pockets of consumers, who could then spend that money on services like shelter and healthcare, two areas where we expect continued inflation strength. The net contribution of the dollar’s outlook to our U.S. core CPI forecast is marginal.

And the stronger labor market?
Unlike weaker energy prices and the stronger dollar, the strengthening U.S. labor market contributes positively to our core CPI outlook. Employer and worker surveys both indicate expectations of higher wages in 2015, and we think that the Employment Cost Index (ECI) – our preferred gauge of wage inflation – will move from its current 2.2% to closer to 3% by the end of 2015 (see Figure 2). The fast pace of declines in unemployment measures supports the view that wage inflation should pick up over the cyclical horizon. We estimate that a 1% increase in personal income contributes 0.14% to core CPI with a 12-month lag. But due to the lag, the impact of higher wages should be only partially realized in 2015.


The Fed has said it may begin policy normalization with core inflation near current levels, but it “would want to be reasonably confident that inflation will move back toward 2% over time.” Higher wages could give it that confidence. Given our view on wages, the Fed could begin to raise rates in mid-2015, but keep in mind that Fed policy will still be very accommodative in the early stages of the tightening cycle, and we expect the pace of hikes to be slow. In the case that wage inflation remains sluggish, the Fed would almost certainly err on the side of caution, perhaps by delaying the first hike or slowing the pace of tightening.

Putting it all together
After gathering all these bottom-up and top-down views, we expect core U.S. inflation (as measured by CPI) to come in somewhere between 1.75% and 2% in 2015, a modest uptick from 2014. And so to answer the question we posed earlier – “Who is right, the markets or the Fed?” – we would say that we tend to side with the Fed. Transitory forces like lower energy prices and a stronger dollar are keeping inflation below target at the moment, but lower energy prices are ultimately good for the consumer, and we anticipate wage inflation picking up over the cyclical horizon.

To its credit, the Fed has been more right than wrong on inflation since the global financial crisis. For most of the past six years, market commentary has centered on how the Fed’s extraordinary monetary policy would fuel higher inflation. And yet, as the Fed stands poised to remove some of that extraordinary accommodation, a new wave of bond market vigilantes are testing their deflation-fighting credibility! However, it isn’t clear to us whether these Treasury bond buyers are truly deflation vigilantes – they may simply be yield-starved investors or portfolio hedgers.

We’ll find out the answers to these questions throughout 2015, which should be an exciting year for the inflation markets. Indeed, current valuations in the TIPS market price 10-year inflation expectations at 1.70% (see Figure 3), compared with the Fed’s inflation target of 2%. If you believe in the Fed’s ability to create inflation, this means that bond investors are currently being paid to hold inflation risk rather than insure themselves against it – contrary to historical norms. These valuation dynamics, along with our outlook for a modest rise in core inflation, lead us to prefer holding U.S. interest rate duration in inflation-protected form. As a result, a TIPS overweight is one of our highest-conviction positions across many PIMCO portfolios.

The Author

Jeremie Banet

Portfolio Manager, Real Return

Brian Hayes

Portfolio Manager, Real Return




Past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future results. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and the current low interest rate environment increases this risk. Current reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. Sovereign securities are generally backed by the issuing government. Obligations of U.S. government agencies and authorities are supported by varying degrees, but are generally not backed by the full faith of the U.S. government. Portfolios that invest in such securities are not guaranteed and will fluctuate in value. Inflation-linked bonds (ILBs) issued by a government are fixed income securities whose principal value is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation; ILBs decline in value when real interest rates rise. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) are ILBs issued by the U.S. government. All investments contain risk and may lose value.

Forecasts, estimates and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. There is no guarantee that results will be achieved. Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are suitable for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.

This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO and YOUR GLOBAL INVESTMENT AUTHORITY are trademarks or registered trademarks of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, respectively, in the United States and throughout the world. ©2015, PIMCO.