Disruption and Dispersion: A Bottom-Up Approach to an Uneven Credit Recovery
- Pandemic-fueled market disruption has led to credit spread dispersion, although downgrades and defaults have likely peaked.
- We expect an uneven credit recovery, increasing the importance of credit selection and creating alpha opportunities.
- We expect demand for high quality sources of income to be strong in 2021, and we see opportunities in recovery trades, financials, housing, and select emerging markets.
Credit markets experienced a roller coaster ride in 2020. Credit spreads initially widened as the emerging COVID-19 pandemic weakened risk sentiment and liquidity, and the global economy was temporarily shut down. But rapid, massive stimulus from central banks and fiscal authorities led to a quick recovery.
Although recent successes in developing and deploying coronavirus vaccines have encouraged investors to look past near-term economic weakness, the pandemic has amplified long-term disruptors, increasing the importance of credit selection and alpha generation.
Disruptive forces are still at play
Fiscal and monetary support have shored up liquidity and staved off widespread defaults but will not cure solvency issues from over-levered balance sheets.
Early in the pandemic, companies went into self-preservation mode, supporting free cash flow by cutting capital spending and increasing liquidity. However, in our view, a return to pre-pandemic fundamentals for the most-affected companies could take years.
As shown in Figure 1, the economic impact of the pandemic has varied widely.
Figure 1: The economic impact of the pandemic varies by sector
As you can see, certain sectors have been relatively insulated and, in some cases, have even benefited from increased demand; examples include healthcare and technology. Conversely, the travel and entertainment industries have seen their earnings severely affected, which has increased insolvency risk.
Although these sectors present risks, they also offer unique opportunities through careful credit research. Analyzing balance sheets and income statements over a wide range of scenarios becomes extremely important in this environment, as does structuring bonds so that bond holders have adequate covenant and collateral protections. We believe it’s important for investors to focus on secured structures with strong collateral and covenants when investing in these affected sectors in order to mitigate downside risks.
So, where do we go from here? While one likely scenario is a return toward “normal” in a post-pandemic world, changes in consumer and corporate behavior cannot be ruled out – the magnitude and extent of which are highly uncertain. We believe these changes will create winners and losers. Winners will include companies that can adapt and prevent their business models from getting disrupted. Losers will include businesses that cannot successfully adapt to changing preferences in a post-pandemic world. Differentiating between the winners and losers will require careful credit and scenario analysis.
Credit spread dispersion remains elevated
Although credit spreads have largely narrowed in the past three quarters, we still see plenty of spread dispersion, which creates opportunities for active managers like PIMCO. For example, investment grade credit spreads are tighter than their long-run averages, but below the surface, dispersion is reminiscent of the 2016 period when the collapse in oil prices led to a significant widening in credit spreads. Despite positive vaccine developments, there is still a meaningful uncertainty premium in credit spreads – particularly in pandemic-affected market segments like transportation, energy, lodging, and entertainment.
Figure 2: Widespread dispersion in investment grade credit spreads
The high yield market is similar in that issuers most exposed to pandemic-related restrictions are trading meaningfully wide of pre-pandemic levels. The high yield market has seen a big change in its composition after the massive influx of so-called fallen angel bonds – those that have seen their credit ratings downgraded from investment grade to high yield. Fallen angels have added more BBs, larger capital structures, and longer maturities to the universe, which stands in stark contrast to the smaller and shorter maturities of the CCC bond market.
Downgrades and defaults have likely peaked
This past year also saw an uptick in downgrades and defaults. Credit rating agencies were quick to act in March and April, but the percentage of bonds on negative outlook and negative watch has since decreased, and November saw more rising stars (bonds that have seen their credit ratings upgraded from high yield to investment grade) than fallen angels.
Although a number of household names defaulted, including several high-profile retailers, as well as a longer tail of smaller energy issuers, these business models were facing headwinds even before the coronavirus. And while energy issuers will likely account for the majority of high yield defaults in the year ahead, other sectors will also come under pressure.
Overall, default rates should be lower in Europe than in the U.S. given the higher quality of the European high yield market and a significantly lower concentration of energy companies. In addition, the absence of an equivalent to the U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy process makes in-court restructuring in Europe a measure of last resort, as opposed to a strategic one. Still, market indicators increasingly point to the end of the default phase and the beginning of the recovery phase.
Of course, in a bear case where vaccines prove to be less effective than expected, default risk will increase. Also, default risk remains high for smaller companies that received less direct fiscal support, those with limited collateral to pledge in exchange for liquidity, and firms facing secular headwinds even before the onset of COVID-19.
Opportunities in 2021
With roughly $17 trillion in fixed income bonds trading at negative yields, we expect demand for high quality sources of income to remain robust in 2021.1 We anticipate that global monetary policy will remain accommodative, which provides an additional source of support to credit markets. Strong global fiscal support will likely continue to provide a bridge to the credit markets until vaccines are more widely distributed, which could help facilitate the recovery of corporate fundamentals. This constructive backdrop should provide solid support for credit markets in 2021, even as some valuations may not offer as much room to rally. As active managers, we are excited about the bottom-up opportunities we see amid an uneven recovery.
Currently, we see several key opportunities in the public credit markets:
Post-pandemic recovery trades
Within the public credit markets, we favor select “recovery trades,” which involve firms we believe are positioned to benefit from economic reopening. Examples include airlines, hospitality, and REITs. Many such companies have raised enough capital to bridge to a post-vaccine recovery, and business functions have been optimized to operate in a post-pandemic world. As vaccines are deployed globally, many companies in these sectors should see earnings growth that helps them begin to recover and de-lever. However, vaccine deployment and economic reopening will not resuscitate sectors facing longer-term secular pressures. For example, we continue to be cautious about retail companies with limited online presence, long-dated auto bonds alongside the move toward autonomous capabilities, and traditional energy companies given the growth of renewable power generation and ongoing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns.
We also see opportunities in financials given the strong cyclical recovery expected in 2021 and Democrats’ success in the Georgia U.S. Senate runoffs. Combined, these developments could stimulate fiscal spending, which should stabilize asset quality metrics and support net interest margins (the difference between what banks pay out in interest and what they receive) from a steeper yield curve. Unlike their substantial role in the global financial crisis, banks are not at the center of the current crisis but could be part of the solution.
We are focused on industry leaders, and we are willing to go down in the capital structure in order to invest in higher-yielding preferred securities. In Europe, we favor subordinated bank debt (AT1s) with a focus on U.K. banks, as we expect yield compression following the removal of Brexit uncertainty. We also favor select continental European banks with strong balance sheets and attractive valuations relative to generic high yield credit.
Additionally, the pandemic continues to benefit housing demand as a result of migration to single-family homes, low interest rates, and work-from-home arrangements. In turn, increased investment in home improvement projects has allowed building product manufacturers to raise prices. We find value in building materials companies with leading market share, residential REITS, and non-agency mortgages.
Select emerging market sovereign and corporate exposure
We are also increasingly focused on select opportunities within emerging markets. There is a high level of value dispersion within emerging markets, and so our focus has been on liquid sovereigns and quasi sovereigns that we believe are distanced from left tail events. Asian credit is also compelling given higher yields and strong growth prospects relative to developed markets. We are specifically focused on corporate sectors in Asia with attractive relative value, such as technology, property, diversified financials, and utilities but remain wary of China’s local government financing vehicles.
In addition to opportunities in global public credit markets, we also see value in private and less-liquid credit. While central banks have used tools that supported more traditional areas of the market, this liquidity hasn’t yet found its way into the private market, so private credit valuations remain attractive, in our view. The pandemic has dramatically altered credit provisioning across private lending markets. Complacency and borrower-friendly structures have been replaced by uncertainty and lender-friendly terms. In addition, a complex regulatory backdrop is creating opportunities to fill capital gaps for private lenders. Key areas of focus include secondary opportunities in residential and consumer-related credit, as well as commercial opportunities across small business, aviation, litigation finance, and other receivables.
Finding investment returns given today’s backdrop will require extensive fundamental research capabilities. We believe investors who utilize active managers with deep resources, a diversified credit platform spanning public and private credit, and extensive quantitative expertise will ultimately be rewarded.
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. High yield, lower-rated securities involve greater risk than higher-rated securities; portfolios that invest in them may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than portfolios that do not. REITs are subject to risk, such as poor performance by the manager, adverse changes to tax laws or failure to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income. Investing in foreign-denominated and/or -domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctuations, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. Private credit involves an investment in non-publically traded securities which may be subject to illiquidity risk. Portfolios that invest in private credit may be leveraged and may engage in speculative investment practices that increase the risk of investment loss. Management risk is the risk that the investment techniques and risk analyses applied by an investment manager will not produce the desired results, and that certain policies or developments may affect the investment techniques available to the manager in connection with managing the strategy.
Alpha is a measure of performance on a risk-adjusted basis calculated by comparing the volatility (price risk) of a portfolio vs. its risk-adjusted performance to a benchmark index; the excess return relative to the benchmark is alpha.
Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.
This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.