Cash for Calls: Managing Liquidity for Illiquid Investments
- Many investors seeking higher returns have turned to investment vehicles focused on private equity, real estate, and private credit, which generally offer an illiquidity premium.
- Yet these investments also present a liquidity-management challenge: Investors must maintain a ready pool of funds to meet capital calls, which can occur at any time.
- Based on our analysis of historical capital calls, we believe a tiered approach to liquidity – in which holdings correspond to risk and timing considerations – can offer an appealing and flexible way for investors to optimize the total return in an alternatives allocation.
Many investors seeking higher returns have turned to private assets. Vehicles focusing on private equity, real estate, and private credit generally offer an illiquidity premium. But they also present a liquidity-management challenge: Investors must maintain a ready pool of funds to meet capital calls, which can occur at any time.
When measuring return on committed capital, holding cash may be suboptimal and erode the Illiquidity premium investors seek. So how can one optimize the risk and return of uncalled capital?
We propose a framework based on historical call behavior of private equity and private debt funds. We detailed our analysis last month in the In Depth piece, “Cash for Calls: A Quantitative Approach to Managing Liquidity for Capital Calls .” A tiered approach to liquidity, in which holdings correspond to risk and timing considerations, lies at its core.
There are two broad approaches to managing uncalled capital.
Conservative investors tend to set aside a portion of their commitment in cash or Treasuries. However, this approach may lead to substantial cash drag on the overall expected returns of the illiquid strategy. By some measures, the drag could amount to almost a third of the 15% net internal rate of return (IRR) often targeted by private equity funds (see Figure 1).
More aggressive investors may seek to invest their committed but uncalled capital in liquid funds in an asset class similar to the private market investment – a so-called public market equivalent or PME. These may include public equities for a traditional private equity fund or higher-yielding bonds for private credit.
A major challenge is that capital calls tend to be procyclical. That is, they can occur and even spike at moments of crisis or deep value when public markets, which react in real time, face headwinds (if they are not in utter free-fall). Thus, approaches more aggressive than cash can present additional risk; for example, the decline in value of the liquid PME precisely when capital calls arrive may drive not just paper losses, but the possibility of becoming a forced seller or even outright default by limited partners (LPs).
Applying liquidity tiering for the private market investor
We believe a better approach lies in the middle ground between ultra-conservative cash holdings and the return-seeking PME allocation – for instance, a blend of approaches, with tiered or staggered allocations across ultrashort bonds, short duration fixed income, and public market equivalent assets depending on one’s investment time horizon, liquidity needs, and volatility profile.
How does this work in practice? As detailed in our In Depth piece, one needs to take a comprehensive look at the private market allocation – the timing and size of calls throughout the life of the illiquid fund as well as the need to provide liquidity during the capital call period – and avoid inflicting undue drag on the total investment. By tiering liquidity with a blend of short duration bonds and appropriate lower-risk PMEs, LPs can potentially optimize their alternatives allocation in a way that may help close the gap versus the return potential of a fully invested private market allocation.
Based on real world call behavior, our research finds that capital for calls anticipated over the next year may be held in active, ultrashort investments with a duration under one year. The next tier consists of capital for calls expected in the second and third years, which may be held in slightly higher-risk (and higher-return-potential) fixed income securities with a matching investment horizon. Finally, remaining capital is held in public market equivalent assets – which for a private debt allocation could be a flexible multi-sector credit strategy or dedicated high yield portfolio (see Figure 2).
This tiering approach provides a customized framework that can be applied to any potential call period. And tiers can be adjusted based on changes to one’s market expectations, either by changing the allocations between tiers, adjusting for a more conservative capital call pacing, or amplifying tier three (PME) exposures via synthetic instruments.
Cash for calls – optimizing a comprehensive private market allocation
Figure 3 shows the potential benefits of liquidity tiering. It shows two applications, one based on average call rates and another, more conservative, approach that tiers for the highest 10th percentile of call rates each year. The key risk-management concern for uncalled capital is the inability to meet future capital calls. To this end, we consider the expected shortfall – i.e., the average difference between the portfolio’s value and the remaining uncalled capital, whenever the former is less than the latter.
Tiering sacrifices some of the PME’s expected returns, an average of about 20 basis points relative to a full PME approach across simulations (1.98% versus 2.18%). However, the magnitude of shortfalls may be dramatically reduced – on the order of 40% and 55% for average and conservative tiering, respectively.
The dynamics of liquidity tiering can naturally facilitate upside capture and reduce downside risk, and may offer an appealing and flexible way for investors to manage committed yet uncalled capital.
This material is provided for information purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments in any jurisdiction.
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results.
All investments contain risk and may lose value. Investing in the bond market is subject to risks, including market, interest rate, issuer, credit, inflation risk, and liquidity risk. The value of most bonds and bond strategies are impacted by changes in interest rates. Bonds and bond strategies with longer durations tend to be more sensitive and volatile than those with shorter durations; bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise, and low interest rate environments increase this risk. Reductions in bond counterparty capacity may contribute to decreased market liquidity and increased price volatility. Bond investments may be worth more or less than the original cost when redeemed. High yield, lower-rated securities involve greater risk than higher-rated securities; portfolios that invest in them may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than portfolios that do not. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic and industry conditions. Private equity and private credit involves an investment in non-publicly traded assets which are subject to liquidity risk. Portfolios that invest in private credit may be leveraged and may engage in speculative investment practices that increase the risk of loss. Private equity is also subject to funding risk or the potential to default on capital commitments, and market risk. An investment in private markets is considered speculative and involves a high risk of investment loss.
This paper includes hypothetical assumptions and scenarios.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Return assumptions are for illustrative purposes only and are not a prediction or a projection of return. Return assumption is an estimate of what investments may earn on average over the long term. Actual returns may be higher or lower than those shown and may vary substantially over shorter time periods.
The allocation examples presented here are for illustrative purposes only and may not be appropriate for all investors. The allocations are not based on any particularized financial situation, or need, and are not intended to be, and should not be construed as, a forecast, research, investment advice or a recommendation for any specific PIMCO strategy, product or service.
Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all investors and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should consult their investment professional prior to making an investment decision. Outlook and strategies are subject to change without notice.
PIMCO as a general matter provides services to qualified institutions, financial intermediaries and institutional investors. Individual investors should contact their own financial professional to determine the most appropriate investment options for their financial situation. This material contains the opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO is a trademark of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. in the United States and throughout the world. ©2022, PIMCO.